Ongoing in class task: Perspective Drawing and 3D Rendering Techniques

This booklet took us through different types of shading (simple, line, and 3 tone shading), single, and two point perspective drawing techniques. Combining these two; shading and perspective, a 3 dimensional drawing can be effectively achieved. 
I found line shading confusing at first, as I am used to using simple gradation shading. Line and Three tone shading just gives an idea of which sides are lightest and which are darkest. I  don't think these are as effective as gradation because the lines and different blocks of colour on a shape, I find, distract the viewer from their purpose, like they are there for decoration rather than depict light and dark. Though this could be because I am not used to the idea of them yet. I have also learnt all about vanishing points, how they work and their purpose. Here are some pages from the workbook!

Single point perspective drawing

Single point perspective drawing with three tone shading added

Single point perspective drawing; filled in extra lines to create the third dimension to the drawing.

Observational Sketches

This is also a little late but it was only today that I took photos of my work, both the map and this drawing. This task was to help with our drawing, imitating what we see and decribing it visually in a certain medium. This drawing was done in charcoal and is of some sort of cardboard chair model, a pile of magazines, a scrap of cardboard and a basketball. I think a successful aspect of this work is the proportion, everything is the right size in relation to other objects. I think that if I had more time to do it I would have put in more shading. This would provide perspective and therefore a better idea of the still life arrangement.

Concept Development: Greenpeace Poster Design

I had originally planned to design a poster for the RSPCA, though I heard a few people were thinking of it and I know a fair bit about the RSPCA already, so I decided to look up an organisation I didn't know much about. On this page I brainstormed a few ideas for the poster, found out some of the events and fundraisers that the RSPCA holds and what they do for animals.

I chose to look up Greenpeace. I roughly found out what main issues they deal with and what their goal is. After researching some of their poster designs I made an attempt at thinking up some of my own that could be as clever and eye catching as theirs. Greenpeace being an organisation that deals with wordly issues like the environment, I tried to bring images of the earth into my designs. Also issues like overfishing and whaling, Climate change and their effect on human life.

Concept 1. This is the first idea that popped into my head, the world as a deflating balloon due to climate change. I think this visual metaphor could work really well. It's simple and direct, the image is in your face and easily interpreted. Colours are kept plain as to maintain attention on the concept of the image rather than the detail. "We're running out of puff" This poster has the potential to be quite appealing to young people because it is straightforward and eye catching. 

Concept 2. This concept is a little more specific to the overfishing issue, though the idea is broadened with the caption "Spot the difference" as in life and death. This one takes a little bit more time to comprehend and the image isn't as striking either. 

Concept 3. In carrying out my words with actions, I designed a poster with humans in it. I haven't seen a great amount of Greenpeace posters with people in them and I think it could really hit home if they did use them. This one is half joking, saying that if pollution continues as it is, in a few decades time we won't be able to breathe our own earth's air. A photo would make it very realistic, with the short caption "Act sooner rather than later"

Wordless Map Evaluation

This is a bit late, but better late than never!
For this task we formed a group of three and on butcher's paper created a map from the Graphic design room to the Textiles room, using no words. The objective of this task was to get us thinking about how images are used in design to direct and give the viewer a straightforward understanding of their purpose. These are descriptive images.
We basically drew three blocks, one with computers (F06), one with lockers and lunch tables (Canteen) and one with stairs, dresses and sewing machines (Textiles room). With an arrow between each we created a clear map directing whoever was to view it from F06 to the textiles room very simply.

It is difficult to make out because it is in pencil so the first drawing is the Computer room, the second is the Canteen and the third, Textiles room.

Adobe Illustrator Caricature!

For this exercise we had to take a photo of ourselves, upload it onto illustrator, trace all facial lines with a pen tool and then manipulate it so it becomes a caricature. 

A caricature is a portrait that exaggerates usually the features of a person and sometimes the whole essence of a person so that it is humourous or possibly insulting.

I found the task quite difficult at first because the pen tool took a fair while to get used to. Then when I had gone to start editing the pen trace I realised i probably needed more lines to create a more substaintial image, and back I went to the original tracing. I experimented with the warp tool first - very entertaining, and then did a lot of work with the direct selection tool, which allowed me to change the size, shape and direction of original lines. 

I changed the shape of different facial features to exaggerate something about them; i have a pointy chin so I made that really big, asian eyes so I made them small, made my eyelashes ridiculously huge to make fun of the fact that I wear lots of mascara, a bobbly nose so i made that fatter and make my hair extra poofy because that's how it sits on my head most of the time. The result is a caricature that looks like a transvestite with tiny eyes. Or Robbie Rotten from  the kids show Lazytown (pictured below).

To improve it I should probably have spent more time on it and thought about what I wanted to do rather than play around with everything. Also the photo taken was quite dark so not all of the facial lines like around my eyes or my teeth showed up very well, making it a little more difficult.

Overall this was an enjoyable task and though my caricature is ridiculously ugly, I feel I know and can use illustrator a lot more confidently than before.

Original photograph

First attempt: not enough lines and a bit too much fun with warp tool.

Second attempt: much better in terms of lines drawn and looking more like me. Not yet manipulated though.

Final caricature: should look more like me but at the same time I hope it doesn't look much like me, it's pretty ugly.

Like this guy, Robbie Rotten.

  

Greenpeace posters

Roughly translates to: "What if it was you next?"

Roughly translates to: "Watch out what grills this summer"

Major Project 1

For my Major Project I have chosen to design a poster for Greenpeace. 
Greenpeace is an independent global campaigning organisation that acts to change attitudes and behaviour, to protect and conserve the environment, and to promote peace.
Greenpeace uses non-violent direct action to expose global environmental problems and to force solutions which are essential to a green and peaceful future.

Their goal is to ensure the ability of the earth to nurture life in all its diversity.


How long has this organisation been established?
Greenpeace evolved from the 'Don't make a wave' committee in Vancouver in the early 1970s.


Can you find any past advertising materials, as well as present? How have these changed over the years, and what do you think these changes have been influenced by?
It has been difficult to find out the dates of Greenpeace posters and materials, as posters, the website and the images found on the internet do not really specify. 
I do definitely think though, that any changes that would have taken place in terms of poster design over the years would have developed from use of modern technology. Things such as photoshop and other editing programs, constant improvements in photography, and the public being more informed in general of wordly issues because of mass media, would alter how Greenpeace designers would go about their work. 


Is the current advertising appropriate to the organisation? why/why not?
I think the current advertising for Greenpeace is very appropriate. They have a great range of pieces from simplistic to detailed, but the message never fails to come across to the viewer loud and clear. The subject of the advertising is also completely varied, Greenpeace doesn't have a single way of producing advertisements, the concepts are all appropriate to what the organisation does. Work can go from realistic, to cartoony, to unnatural, which ensures that Greenpeace holds the viewers' interest with every image, people won't glance at it, recognise it and then ignore it, they will look and be intrigued, then continue to find out more. It's a very successful approach!


How could a different design be more appropriate?
I think the current designs are quite effective, though one thing they could incorporate is people. Not much of their work has humans in them, and I think that if people saw humans in a Greenpeace design, in their signature striking way, it would really hit home for the viewer and make the viewer realise they have to do something to save themselves, the planet, other people and the future. It could really put the viewer in the shoes of the design's subject matter.